December 11, 2003

I bet it has Hugh Grant in it ;)

Ith* does a movie review. It sounds like a chick movie to me. If I find a chick, I might take her to see it, provided there is not some action adventure movie with a lot of blood splatterin, some extreme car chase scenes and some babes with big hooters in skimpy bathin' suits.

*Ith has posted a picture of her fine self on her blog with an invitation for one and all to come eat her cookies. Now is that an accomodatin' gal or what?

Posted by notGeorge at December 11, 2003 04:34 PM
Comments

I'm not a big fan of chick flicks, so take it for what it's worth :) It's been a long time since I've heard so much laughter from the audience while watching a movie, and I'd say the audience was evenly split between men and women. And the two men behind us were doing more than their fair share of the laughing.

Posted by: Ith at December 11, 2003 05:04 PM

But did it have Hugh Grant in it? ;)

Posted by: Tiger at December 11, 2003 05:10 PM

Hmm? Sorry, didn't know you wanted to know :) Yes. Along with half the actors in Britian it seemed. And a few Americans for good measure. Really big cast.

Posted by: Ith at December 11, 2003 05:43 PM

The point is not whether Hugh Grant was in it. He can't be in EVERY chick flick. The point is that Hugh Grant lacks the talent to be in anything BUT a chick flick. What a lightweight.

Posted by: Velociman at December 11, 2003 07:06 PM

I prefer the action adventure movie with a lot of blood splatterin, some extreme car chase scenes and some babes with big hooters in skimpy bathin' suits movies as opposed the the chick flicks ..... my only exception is When Harry met Sally.

Of course ... I'm not your normal chick :-P

Posted by: squishybear at December 12, 2003 10:35 AM