OK, so they dismissed the Pledge of Allegiance case by sayin' that there had no standin' to bring the case in the first place, thereby sidesteppin' the need to rule on the constitutionality of the matter. I would boo and hiss, but the concurrences do give some measure of redemption as to the stance the Court took on the issue, but still -- they skipped settin' a precedent on the matter.
Posted by Tiger at June 14, 2004 04:52 PM | TrackBack